Cite This Item

Copy Citation

MLA
“Appendix: Supplemental Analysis.” The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony, by Carolyn Wong et al., RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 2015, pp. 24–25, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt15sk8ph.13. Accessed 4 June 2020.
APA
Wong, C., Aharoni, E., Aliyev, G., & Du Bois, J. (2015). Appendix: Supplemental Analysis. In The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony (pp. 24-25). Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Retrieved June 4, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt15sk8ph.13
CHICAGO
Wong, Carolyn, Eyal Aharoni, Gursel Rafig Oglu Aliyev, and Jacqueline Du Bois. "Appendix: Supplemental Analysis." In The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony, 24-25. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, 2015. Accessed June 4, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt15sk8ph.13.

Export Citation

Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley…)
Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Note: Always review your references and make any necessary corrections before using. Pay attention to names, capitalization, and dates.