@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt9m0w0h.10,
 ISBN = {9781451484465},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9m0w0h.10},
 abstract = {We saw in the fifth chapter how, among Neo-Scholastics, the background to the dogmatization of the assumption lay in heavy reliance on the ability of dogmatic theology to deduce, or at least infer, the various Marian privileges from each other. This was possible because all of these privileges—from divine motherhood and perpetual virginity through immaculate conception and coredemption to assumption—could be regarded as interlinked by ties of either necessity (hence “deduce”) or fittingness,convenientia(hence “infer”). I suggested that, in some cases at least, such Neo-Scholastic theologians were not especially interested in historical facts, the close examination of},
 bookauthor = {Aidan Nichols},
 booktitle = {There Is No Rose: The Mariology of the Catholic Church},
 pages = {131--150},
 publisher = {Augsburg Fortress, Publishers},
 title = {Our Lady and the Church},
 year = {2015}
}