@inbook{10.7591/j.ctt32b630.7,
 ISBN = {9780801452277},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt32b630.7},
 abstract = {Public funding holds great potential to affect the financial fortunes of participating candidates, but it is equally likely to change how they use their time. Whether the act of fundraising is “bad” in a normative sense is debatable, but it stands to reason that since public funding frees them from fundraising obligations, participating candidates are likely to pursue a different set of activities on a week-to-week basis than they would otherwise. Indeed, the framers of Arizona’s law recognized that running with traditional contributions “requires that elected officials spend too much of their time raising funds rather than representing the public”},
 bookauthor = {Michael G. Miller},
 booktitle = {Subsidizing Democracy: How Public Funding Changes Elections and How It Can Work in the Future},
 pages = {46--63},
 publisher = {Cornell University Press},
 title = {Campaign Time},
 year = {2014}
}