The American Response to Canada Since 1776
The American Response to Canada Since 1776
Gordon T. Stewart
Copyright Date: 1992
Published by: Michigan State University Press
Pages: 232
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.14321/j.ctt7zt6dc
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
The American Response to Canada Since 1776
Book Description:

Canadians long have engaged in in-depth, wide-ranging discussions about their nation's relations with the United States. On the other hand, American citizens usually have been satisfied to accept a series of unexamined myths about their country's unchanging, benign partnership with the "neighbor to the north". Although such perceptions of uninterrupted, friendly relations with Canada may dominate American popular opinion, not to mention discussions in many American scholarly and political circles, they should not, according to Stewart, form the bases for long-term U.S. international economic, political, and cultural relations with Canada. Stewart describes and analyzes the evolution of U.S. policymaking and U.S. policy thinking toward Canada, from the tense and confrontational post-Revolutionary years to the signing of the Free Trade Agreement in 1988, to discover if there are any permanent characteristics of American policies and attitudes with respect to Canada. American policymakers were concerned for much of the period before World War II with Canada's role in the British empire, often regarded as threatening, or at least troubling, to developing U.S. hegemony in North America and even, in the late nineteenth century, to U.S. trade across the Pacific. A permanent goal of U.S. policymakers was to disengage Canada from that empire. They also thought that Canada's natural geographic and economic orientation was southward to the U.S., and policymakers were critical of Canadian efforts to construct an east- west economy. The Free Trade Agreement of 1988 which prepared the way for north-south lines of economic force, in this context, had been an objective of U.S. foreign policy since the founding of the republic in 1776. At the same time, however, these deep-seated U.S. goals were often undermined by domestic lobbies and political factors within the U.S., most evidently during the era of high tariffs from the 1860s to the 1930s when U.S. tariff policies actually encouraged a separate, imperially-backed economic and cultural direction in Canada. When the dramatic shift toward integration in trade, investment, defense and even popular culture began to take hold in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s in the wake of the Depression and World War II, American policymakers viewed themselves as working in harmony with underlying, "natural" converging economic, political and cultural trends recognized and accepted by their Canadian counterparts.

eISBN: 978-0-87013-957-4
Subjects: History
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-iv)
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. v-vi)
  3. Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements (pp. vii-viii)
  4. A Note on Terminology
    A Note on Terminology (pp. 1-2)
  5. I Introduction
    I Introduction (pp. 3-22)

    Canada is an odd case in the scholarly field of United States foreign relations because much more has been written by the Canadian side than the American. A basic characteristic of the U.S. foreign relations field in recent years has been the shift from American-centered research and interpretations to multiple perspective approaches.Research in the foreign country or countries, and incorporation of interpretations from those countries, are now viewed as essential elements in the scholarly analysis of U.S. foreign policy. The topic of Sino-American relations is perhaps the best-known example of this new approach as scholars such as Michael Hunt have...

  6. II “Tendencies to Bad Neighborhood” 1783-1854
    II “Tendencies to Bad Neighborhood” 1783-1854 (pp. 23-60)

    The United States and Canada began as bad neighbors. During the first seventy or so years after independence, the American response to Canada was characterized by suspicion and hostility. The War of 1812 (during which William Hull, Governor of Michigan Territory and Brigadier General in the Army of the Northwest, led an invasion and declared Upper Canada to be conquered by the United States) was the most dramatic manifestation of the tension and distrust between the two countries. The outbreak of war only served as confirmation to Americans that the Canadian colonies were a threatening and destabilizing force in North...

  7. III “A Second Empire” 1854-1892
    III “A Second Empire” 1854-1892 (pp. 61-100)

    In the 1840s, Americans had anticipated the disintegration of the British Empire in North America. The end of the old colonial trading system, the advent of responsible government, and the reduction of the garrisons appeared as steps toward independence for the British North American colonies. Yet the next fifty years thoroughly undermined these American hopes. In 1867 the Canadas, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick joined to form the Dominion of Canada. By 1871 this strengthened British colony extended its reach across the continent as it took over the vast territories of the Hudson’s Bay Company and secured the entry of...

  8. IV “Broad Questions of National Policy” 1892-1911
    IV “Broad Questions of National Policy” 1892-1911 (pp. 101-126)

    In 1892, the Republican administration led by Harrison and Blaine refused to consider the possibility of reciprocity with Canada; in 1911, a Republican administration led by President Howard Taft and Secretary of State Philander C. Knox worked energetically to promote a reciprocal trade agreement with Canada. In 1892, Harrison and Blaine concluded that Canada could never fit into American economic needs because she duplicated American agricultural production; in 1911, Taft and Knox argued that Canada’s agricultural and natural resources were urgently needed by the United States. What caused this complete turnaround in American thinking?

    It is tempting to explain the...

  9. V “An Object of American Foreign Policy since the Founding of the Republic” 1911-1988
    V “An Object of American Foreign Policy since the Founding of the Republic” 1911-1988 (pp. 127-174)

    The Taft administration believed it had offered “an excellent bargain” to Canada in 1911. Even the Canadian Governor-General recognized the generosity of the American position. “The arrangement,” Grey wrote to Bryce, “which secures a free entry into a market of 90 million people for the natural produce of Canada while it secures the home market for Canadian manufacturers is a good one.”¹ American policymakers attributed the failure of reciprocity, not to the indiscretions of Champ Clark, but to the imperial forces in Canada. In this view they were supported by the assessment of Fielding, the Canadian Minister of Finance. “On...

  10. VI ASSESSMENT
    VI ASSESSMENT (pp. 175-206)

    The questions to be answered in this concluding chapter remain those posed at the outset. Are there any permanent features or recurring patterns in the American response to Canada? Is it possible to identify an American policy toward Canada and, in particular, does it make sense to think in terms of an American imperialism directed against Canada? These questions are more difficult than they seem. There is so much encrustation on the American relationship with Canada that the underlying pattern is easily obscured. There have always been so many demographic, economic, and cultural interactions between the two countries; such a...

  11. Selected Bibliography
    Selected Bibliography (pp. 207-212)
  12. Index
    Index (pp. 213-219)
  13. Back Matter
    Back Matter (pp. 220-221)
Michigan State University Press logo