Air Force Major Defense Acquisition Program Cost Growth Is Driven by Three Space Programs and the F-35A
Air Force Major Defense Acquisition Program Cost Growth Is Driven by Three Space Programs and the F-35A: Fiscal Year 2013 President's Budget Selected Acquisition Reports
Robert S. Leonard
Akilah Wallace
Copyright Date: 2014
Published by: RAND Corporation
Pages: 50
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs2v4
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Air Force Major Defense Acquisition Program Cost Growth Is Driven by Three Space Programs and the F-35A
Book Description:

Controlling costs in Major Defense Acquisition Programs is essential to the overall affordability of Air Force modernization plans. A handful of ongoing and recently terminated programs account for substantially higher cost growth in recent Air Force programs compared with complete programs. Cost growth to date in four continuing large-dollar programs must be contained to ensure affordability of the Air Force’s long-term investment plans.

eISBN: 978-0-8330-8994-6
Subjects: History, Technology
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-ii)
  2. Preface
    Preface (pp. iii-iv)
  3. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. v-vi)
  4. Figures
    Figures (pp. vii-viii)
  5. Tables
    Tables (pp. ix-x)
  6. Summary
    Summary (pp. xi-xiv)
  7. Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments (pp. xv-xvi)
  8. Abbreviations
    Abbreviations (pp. xvii-xviii)
  9. Chapter One. Selected Acquisition Report Data and Analytics
    Chapter One. Selected Acquisition Report Data and Analytics (pp. 1-12)

    In the past four decades, the military services and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) have managed hundreds of very large weapon system acquisition programs. These programs, known as Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs), account for more than 40 percent of all weapon system acquisition funding appropriated by Congress. Cost growth and schedule slips in MDAPs cause difficulty in managing acquisition budget accounts and delays in delivering required capabilities to the warfighter. This analysis is one in a series designed to improve MDAP outcomes and develop better cost-estimating tools for use by the acquisition community.

    We analyze cost...

  10. Chapter Two. Analysis of Major Defense Acquisition Programs with Substantial Air Force Funding
    Chapter Two. Analysis of Major Defense Acquisition Programs with Substantial Air Force Funding (pp. 13-28)

    Each year, RAND updates the database using the latest SARs.¹ Analyses are conducted to assess the cost growth of the current programs and compare growth with that of prior programs. Analyses in the past few years have focused on cost growth from MS B in Continuing and Complete MDAPs. These analyses show cost growth experienced to date in Continuing programs versus the total cost growth experienced over the life of Complete programs.

    We examine simple average and dollar-weighted average cost growth for multiple metrics. Additional analysis is conducted on the very largest of the New and Continuing programs because they...

  11. Chapter Three. Findings for Major Defense Acquisition Programs with Substantial Air Force Funding
    Chapter Three. Findings for Major Defense Acquisition Programs with Substantial Air Force Funding (pp. 29-30)

    The averages for all acquisition cost growth metrics except development are substantially higher in Continuing programs than Complete programs, indicating that Continuing programs have already experienced a higher rate of cost growth than Completed programs. This finding is statistically significant after adjusting for production quantity changes. Explanations that contribute to this finding are the longer average durations of the Continuing programs, the high frequency of space programs among the Continuing programs, and the absence of electronics programs among the Continuing programs.

    The lower average cost growth in development for Continuing programs was a change from the prior year’s analysis, in...

  12. Bibliography
    Bibliography (pp. 31-32)
RAND Corporation logo