Asia in Washington

Asia in Washington: Exploring the Penumbra of Transnational Power

Kent E. Calder
Copyright Date: 2014
Pages: 366
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt6wpc3h
  • Cite this Item
  • Book Info
    Asia in Washington
    Book Description:

    For several centuries, international relations has been primarily the purview of nation-states. Key powers have included at various times Great Britain, France, Japan, China, Russia (then the U.S.S.R., and then Russia again), and the nation most influential in international relations for the past several decades has been the United States. But in a world growing smaller, with a globalizing system increasing in complexity by the day, the nation-state paradigm is not as dominant as it once was.

    InAsia in Washington, longtime Asia analyst Kent Calder examines the concept of "global city" in the context of international affairs. The term typically has been used in an economic context, referring to centers of international finance and commerce such as New York, Tokyo, and London. But Calder extends the concept to political centers as well-particularly in this case, Washington, D.C.

    Improved communications, enhanced transportation, greater economic integration and activity have created a new economic village, and global political cities are arising within the new structure-distinguished not by their CEOs or stock markets but by their influence over policy decisions, and their amassing of strategic intelligence on topics from national policy trends to geopolitical risk.

    Calder describes the rise of Washington, D.C., as perhaps the preeminent global political city-seat of the world's most powerful government, center of NGO and multilateral policy activity, the locale of institutions such as the World Bank and IMF, and home to numerous think tanks and universities.

    Within Washington, the role of Asia is especially relevant for several reasons. It represents the core of the non-Western industrialized world and the most challenge to Western dominance. It also raises the delicate issue of how race matters in international global governance-a factor crucially important during a time of globalization. And since Asia developed later than the West, its changing role in Washington raises major issues regarding how rising powers assimilate themselves into global governance structure. How do Asian nations establish, increase, and leverage their Washington presence, and what is the impact on Washington itself and the decisions made there? Kent Calder explains it all inAsia in Washington.

    eISBN: 978-0-8157-2539-8
    Subjects: Political Science, History

Table of Contents

  1. Front Matter
    (pp. i-vi)
  2. Table of Contents
    (pp. vii-viii)
  3. List of Figures and Tables
    (pp. ix-xii)
  4. List of Abbreviations
    (pp. xiii-xiv)
  5. Preface and Acknowledgments
    (pp. xv-xviii)
  6. Introduction: Toward a New Paradigm for International Relations
    (pp. 1-7)

    For three and a half centuries and more, international relations has been seen as a matter of ties among nation-states: France, China, Russia, Japan, and, preeminently over the past two decades, the United States of America. Yet in a globalizing system of rising complexity, that view has grown too simple. It is time for a new paradigm.

    To be sure, America has the strongest military in the world. Despite persistent U.S. domestic controversy over fiscal policy, the dollar continues to prevail as the global key currency. In many ways the United States still remains, as Secretary of State Madeleine Albright...

  7. 1 Washington as a Global Political City
    (pp. 8-29)

    For well over three hundred and fifty years, since the 1648 Peace of Westphalia, states have been the central actors of the international system. Since the end of the Thirty Years’ War, it has been states, after all, that decide matters of war and peace, conduct diplomacy, and fight wars. In domestic affairs it is they that have generally guaranteed civil order, received and collected taxes, erected public works, and provided for the general welfare. And the state’s role grew markedly greater, in both domestic and international affairs, across the course of the twentieth century, galvanized by leaders as varied...

  8. 2 Washington’s Power Game and Its Transformation
    (pp. 30-63)

    Washington today acts on an international stage and is the capital of arguably the most influential nation on earth. It is the quintessential global political city, whose local dynamics have fateful significance for the broader world. Yet its behavior is by no means a straightforward reflection of American national policy. Indeed, as shown in the preceding chapter, the way Washington operates is heavily shaped by distinctive, historically embedded, institutional features—subtly changing over time—that need to be understood in their own right.

    For more than a century after colonial settlers landed at Jamestown and Plymouth Rock, the environs of...

  9. 3 The Washington Factor in Asia
    (pp. 64-85)

    Washington is a cosmopolitan city that interacts with its counterparts throughout the world. Many of its international relationships, together with their overall structure, have implications for the global political system because of Washington’s standing as the capital of the world’s preeminent superpower. It is Washington in both dimensions—as the American national capital and as a global political city—that I consider in this chapter. Its significance in the local political life of America’s partner nations clearly varies, both with the nature of their ties to the United States and with the character of their sociopolitical linkages to Washington itself....

  10. 4 The Asia Factor in Washington
    (pp. 86-101)

    Washington, as noted in the preceding pages, looms large today in Asia—much larger than before World War II and larger even than a decade or two ago. Given Asia’s heavy export dependence on the U.S. market, and the hub-and-spokes structure of security ties, Asian officials feel a strong need to network and coordinate with their Washington-based U.S. government counterparts. And given the presence of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund in Washington, Asian officials feel an increasing incentive, as the Asian private sector also does, to coordinate in the U.S. capital on multilateral matters as well. Given...

  11. 5 Asia across America: The Changing Calculus
    (pp. 102-121)

    Washington, of course, has a distinctive local dynamic of its own—“inside the Beltway”—as a global political city. Yet it is also deeply linked, both politically and economically, to the rest of the United States, as America’s capital. As socioeconomic relationships across the Pacific steadily deepen, as immigration from Asia increases, and as Asian American activities across America intensify, ethnic politics becomes an increasingly important element of “Asia in Washington” as well.

    In this chapter, I begin with an overview of Asian American history in the United States, showing how the distinctive features of Asian American political behavior today—...

  12. 6 Profiles of National Response: Overview and Hypotheses
    (pp. 122-139)

    Asian nations in general, as shown in chapter 5, have an unusual challenge in attaining and sustaining Washington access, for embedded historical and cultural reasons. Since World War II, and especially since the 1960s and 1970s, global growth and rising transpacific interdependence have made resolving that challenge ever more pressing. All the nations of Asia share this common challenge and the deepening urgency of an effective response.

    Although all Asian nations do face a common general challenge in Washington, national responses vary in important ways—with implications for both policy and theory. The variations raise questions about the competitive efficacy...

  13. 7 Northeast Asia in Washington
    (pp. 140-201)

    Northeast Asia is a volatile, heavily armed region where many of the great powers of the world come warily into contact. China, Russia, and Japan all surround the divided Korean peninsula, where United Nations forces, with major American involvement, stand along an armistice line between a rapidly growing South Korea and a North Korea that has tested nuclear weapons and is developing long-range missiles. The region is rife with conflict and political ambiguity along many dimensions. Both Korea and China are divided states with the constituent parts competing bitterly for legitimacy. Territorial boundaries between Russia and Japan, China and Japan,...

  14. 8 South and Southeast Asia in Washington
    (pp. 202-252)

    South and Southeast Asia have forged longer and in many ways deeper historical ties with Washington than have their neighbors in Northeast Asia (see chapter 7). Thailand was the first nation in Asia with which the United States established diplomatic ties (in 1832), while the Philippines was the only Asian nation to have been under U.S. sovereignty (1898 to 1946). As we shall see, India and the Philippines, as early democracies, arguably had the strongest early post–World War II Asian presence in Washington, and Vietnam was a central preoccupation of American foreign policy (as a whole) until the mid-1970s....

  15. 9 Global Implications
    (pp. 253-267)

    Washington, as we have seen, is a complex, fluid, political community—one whose boundaries far transcend the formal institutions of the American nation-state. It includes, conspicuously, a penumbra of power surrounding the U.S. government that performs important global functions in its own right. Both the informal and formal sides of Washington are continually evolving. Indeed, political Washington has changed dramatically over the three decades and more since Ronald Reagan served as president. It has changed even more profoundly since Franklin D. Roosevelt and his associates began forging the modern presidency eight decades ago.

    Within America’s national capital, the countries of...

  16. 10 Policy Implications
    (pp. 268-280)

    As has become clear over the past nine chapters, paradox abounds in the transnational politics of Washington. Emerging historically from a distinctly parochial heritage, the District of Columbia has grown to become one of the most global of cities. In conventional realist terms, however, many of the largest and most powerful nations in the world have less visibility and influence within its confines than some of the smallest and seemingly most insignificant.

    Many of the greatest sociopolitical paradoxes in America’s national capital relate to the subject of this volume: Asia in Washington. Asia lies on the other side of the...

  17. Appendix A. Important Events, America and Asia, 1784–2013
    (pp. 281-286)
  18. Appendix B. Registered Foreign Agents in Washington, Key Asian Governments, 1945–2010
    (pp. 287-288)
  19. Bibliography
    (pp. 289-292)
  20. Notes
    (pp. 293-354)
  21. Index
    (pp. 355-366)
  22. Back Matter
    (pp. 367-367)