Journal Article

Idealistische Häresien in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Cassirer, Carnap und Kuhn

Thomas Mormann
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie
Vol. 30, No. 2 (1999), pp. 233-271
Published by: Springer
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25171149
Page Count: 39

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Hats, Idealism, Philosophy of science, Modern philosophy, Nuns, Empiricism, Mathematization, Dualism
Were these topics helpful?

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download ($43.95)
  • Cite this Item
Your search terms occurs 20 times in this item.
Idealistische Häresien in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Cassirer, Carnap und Kuhn
Preview not available

Abstract

Idealist Heresies in Philosophy of Science: Cassirer, Carnap, and Kuhn. As common wisdom has it, philosophy of science in the analytic tradition and idealist philosophy are incompatible. Usually, not much effort is spent for explaining what is to be understood by idealism. Rather, it is taken for granted that idealism is an obsolete and unscientific philosophical account. In this paper it is argued that this thesis needs some qualification. Taking Carnap and Kuhn as paradigmatic examples of positivist and postpositivist philosophies of science it is shown that these accounts share important features with Cassirer's idealist philosophy of science developed in the first half of this century. As it turns out, often Cassirer is more modern than those classical philosophers of (post)posivitist philosophy of science. For instance, Quine's criticism against Carnap's empiricist philosophy of science launched in Two Dogmas of Empiricism is anticipated by Cassirer for several decades.