Marriage In A Culture Of Divorce
Marriage In A Culture Of Divorce
Karla B. Hackstaff
Series: Women in the Political Economy
Copyright Date: 1999
Published by: Temple University Press
Pages: 292
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bsthk
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Marriage In A Culture Of Divorce
Book Description:

Today, when fifty percent of couples who marry eventually get divorced, it's clear that we have moved from a culture in which "marriage is forever" to one in which "marriage is contingent." Author Karla Hackstaff looks at intact marriages to examine the impact of new expectations in a culture of divorce.Marriage in a Culture of Divorceexamines the shifting meanings of divorce and gender for two generations of middle-class, married couples. Hackstaff finds that new social and economic conditions both support and undermine the efforts of spouses to redefine the meaning of marriage in a culture of divorce. The definitions of marriage, divorce, and gender have changed for all, but more for the young than the old, and more for women than for men. While some spouses in both generations believe that marriage is for life and that men should dominate in marriage, the younger generation of spouses increasingly construct marriage as contingent rather than forever.Hackstaff presents this evidence in archival case studies of couples married in the 1950s, which she then contrasts with her own case studies of people married during the 1970s, finding evidence of a significant shift in who does the emotional work of maintaining the relationship. It is primarily the woman in the '50s couples who "monitors" the marriage, whereas in the '70s couples both husband and wife support a "marital work ethic," including couples therapy in some cases.The words and actions of the couples Hackstaff follows in depth - the '50s Stones, Dominicks, Hamptons, and McIntyres, and the '70s Turners, Clement-Leonettis, Greens, Kason-Morrises, and Nakatos -- reveal the changes and contradictory tendencies of married life in the U.S. There are traditional relationships characterized by male dominance, there are couples striving for gender equality, there are partners pulling together, and partners pulling apart.Those debating "family values" should not forget, Hackstaff contends, that there are costs associated with marriage culture as well as divorce culture, and they should view divorce as a transitional means for defining marriage in an egalitarian direction. She convincingly illustrates her controversial position, that although divorce has its cost to society, the divorce culture empowers wives and challenges the legacy of male dominance that previously set the conditions for marriage endurance.

eISBN: 978-1-4399-0555-5
Subjects: Sociology
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-vi)
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. vii-viii)
  3. Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments (pp. ix-xii)
  4. Introduction: Watershed in the Meaning of Marriage
    Introduction: Watershed in the Meaning of Marriage (pp. 1-10)

    When I was selecting earrings for my wedding, I was not thinking about my research. Nevertheless, it was inevitably an occasion for the expression of marital meaning. When I remarked that a particular pair was a bit too expensive, the salesperson tried to convince this reluctant spender by saying, “Yeah, but these are for once in a lifetime.” Then, acknowledging the times, she added, “hopefully”—an adverb that even on the threshold of marriage nods in the direction of divorce. This was neither the first nor the last time that I heard such trailing adverbs. While the “once in a...

  5. 1 Marriage and the Construction of Ideology: From Marriage Culture to Divorce Culture
    1 Marriage and the Construction of Ideology: From Marriage Culture to Divorce Culture (pp. 11-26)

    In their classic article, “Marriage and the Construction of Reality: An Exercise in the Microsociology of Knowledge,” Berger and Kellner (1964) provided a detailed and insightful portrait of how marital “realities” are constructed over time. Marriage is described as a “dramatic act in which two strangers come together and redefine themselves.” Socially constituted selves inevitably change as the spouses’ once separate social circles gradually merge. Marriage entails constructing and objectifying a shared subworld embedded in the private sphere and serves to siphon off surplus, potentially disruptive energy. In Berger and Kellner’s account, the narrowing and stabilization of personality brought about...

  6. 2 The Shifting Grounds for Divorce: Structural and Cultural Conditions for Change
    2 The Shifting Grounds for Divorce: Structural and Cultural Conditions for Change (pp. 27-55)

    Divorce is only one thread in the fabric of family and social change we have witnessed in recent decades. Demographers Ahlburg and De Vita (1992, 1) remarked that “The family has changed so much in just a few decades that it is difficult for individuals and social institutions to keep up.” In addition to divorce, salient developments have included cohabitation, domestic partnerships, gay and lesbian marriage ceremonies, blended families, single parenthood, and dual-job couples. All have contributed to the diversification of relationship ideals and the decline of the reigning ideal. While they are all distinct developments, together they question fundamental...

  7. 3 The Push of Marriage Culture Among ’50s Spouses
    3 The Push of Marriage Culture Among ’50s Spouses (pp. 56-74)

    From the early years of their marital commitment, the ’50s couples have watched the clouds of divorce gather on the distant horizon. Over the decades, the clouds have grown in number, changed their shape, and moved closer to home. From the time of the first adult interviews in 1958, when the U.S. divorce rate stood at a low (relative to a surge after World War II) of 2.1 per thousand population, to the early 1980s when it had more than doubled to around five per thousand, the volume of divorce increased tremendously (Cherlin 1992; Glick and Sung-Lin 1986).¹ Whether these...

  8. 4 The ’50s Dominicks: Dominating with Divorce Culture
    4 The ’50s Dominicks: Dominating with Divorce Culture (pp. 75-87)

    While I was conducting my research, I had a chance encounter at an airport with a man who was about sixty years old. Upon hearing that my research was about divorce, he said, “I’ve told my wife she better do as I say, or I’ll divorce her and she’ll find herself in the poor house.” In the same breath, he both showed his knowledge of many women’s downward mobility after divorce and demonstrated how the combination of male dominance and divorce culture can work. For those whose beliefs are rooted in divorce culture, the door to divorce is always open....

  9. 5 The ’50s Hamptons and Other Couples: Redefining Marriage Culture in Terms of Gender Equality
    5 The ’50s Hamptons and Other Couples: Redefining Marriage Culture in Terms of Gender Equality (pp. 88-101)

    Unlike the Dominicks or the traditionalist Stones, some ’50s spouses take advantage of changes in women’s roles to redefine their marriages in terms of gender equality while retaining their belief in “marriage as forever.” Divorce culture and gender equality become salient at a time when the ’50s couples are well into their marriages. By and large, the children have been raised and occupational demands have subsided. In short, incentives and deterrents to divorce have shifted in relation to the life course. Because the gendered division of labor regarding child rearing and wage earning can become less central in later years,...

  10. 6 ’50s Spouses Secure Equal Footing in Divorce Culture
    6 ’50s Spouses Secure Equal Footing in Divorce Culture (pp. 102-116)

    By the early 1980s, the generation marrying around 1950 has traversed the conformist 1950s, turbulent 1960s, and experimental 1970s and entered a decade nostalgic for, but hardly a duplicate of, the 1950s. These couples married when marriage culture prevailed. Yet the longer their marriages have endured, the more divorce proliferates around them, the more stigma recedes, the more legal and economic hurdles are lowered, and the more gender equality marks cultural expectations. Marriage culture and male dominance are losing their hegemonic hold. Still, only a few ’50s spouses challenge all the old terms. These spouses talk in terms of optional...

  11. 7 The ’50s Era in a Rearview Mirror
    7 The ’50s Era in a Rearview Mirror (pp. 117-133)

    The first divorce 39-year-old Patrick Reeves can recall is that of an older cousin who divorced in the early 1960s. Patrick, who was about 10 years old at the time, replays his reaction: “Whoooa, it shook me to the core that that could happen.Andthey had children—smallchildren—even to me at that time.” From the vantage of the early 1990s, Patrick describes a ripple effect through his extended family after this cousin’s divorce: “That like broke the logjam or something and then the next five years, there must have been probably three or four [divorces]. And eventually...

  12. 8 The Pull of Divorce Culture: Divorce Anxiety Among ’70s Spouses
    8 The Pull of Divorce Culture: Divorce Anxiety Among ’70s Spouses (pp. 134-148)

    As Bill Gilmore discusses the models for his marriage, he notes that his “perception of marriage” is drawn from his “parents and other people.” The “other people,” he explains, were “who I associated with that were married when I wasn’t married … who for the most part aren’t married anymore.” Bill remarks that an era followed when they were the “odd couple out” because all their “friends were single or divorced and we were married.” He reports that among his friends “the majority of people that we associate withnoware married” and that “there are no visible signs of...

  13. 9 ’70s Couples Aim for Relational Equality
    9 ’70s Couples Aim for Relational Equality (pp. 149-162)

    The comic strip “Cathy” provides a daily slice of popular culture through the story of a white, middle-class, single woman who continually wrestles with the prospect of marriage. The particular strip below captures the way a culture of marriage competes with a culture of divorce and smuggles in gendered stereotypes in the process.¹ Cathy tabulates weddings and points to traditional meanings of marriage, including “commitment,” “stability,” and “nurturance.” Irving’s reply, by emphasizing “this season inreallife,” accords divorce a realism denied marriage and points to a competing cultural reality. When Irving comments that the spouses “by all accounts, were...

  14. 10 The ’70s Greens: Traditionalism in the 1990s
    10 The ’70s Greens: Traditionalism in the 1990s (pp. 163-179)

    In spite of the challenges and changes represented by divorce culture and gender equality, traditionalism is alive and well in the 1990s. “Traditional,” as I have used the term, refers to spouses who embrace not only the ideals of marriage culture, but also male authority. The ’50s traditionalists never felt the need to defend their beliefs—even after the 1970s watershed of gender and marital change. For the Older generation, the process of defending one’s ideals and practices from widespread social influences was more pertinent for the “divorcee,” the “egalitarian” or the “single mother.” However, the ’70s traditionalists have not...

  15. 11 “Topsy-Turvy” Marriages Among ’70s Spouses
    11 “Topsy-Turvy” Marriages Among ’70s Spouses (pp. 180-199)

    When 39-year-old, Euro-American Roxanne Kason-Morris is asked to address the meaning of marriage in the 1990s, she notes the high divorce rates and wonders about changing roles in recent generations:

    In the old times, no one questioned what the woman’s and the man’s role is.Now it's all topsy-turvyand uh … then who’s going to take care of the children is a big question and um, two working parents, of course, you have to divide the responsibility and the woman is forever resentful toward the man who doesn’t take his full share—or half the share. [ … ]...

  16. 12 Divorce Culture: A Quest for Relational Equality in Marriage
    12 Divorce Culture: A Quest for Relational Equality in Marriage (pp. 200-216)

    When people marry they do not simply tie a knot, but weave a complex of relationships according to pre-existing patterns. In U.S. history, the institution of marriage has been like a loom through which several threads of social relations have been woven. Marriage has been a monogamous, lifelong commitment that has regulated gender, sexuality, and the physical and social reproduction of the generations. This Western marital pattern is being redesigned. We are still responding to the tapestry of old, but the various threads are being disaggregated and rewoven. Our society is deeply divided regarding the value and meaning of these...

  17. Appendix: Methodological Notes
    Appendix: Methodological Notes (pp. 217-230)
  18. Notes
    Notes (pp. 231-258)
  19. Bibliography
    Bibliography (pp. 259-278)
  20. Index
    Index (pp. 279-289)