Collaborative Colonial Power
Collaborative Colonial Power: The Making of the Hong Kong Chinese
Law Wing Sang
Series: Hong Kong Culture and Society
Copyright Date: 2009
Published by: Hong Kong University Press
Pages: 276
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1xcs5s
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Collaborative Colonial Power
Book Description:

Law Wing Sang provides an alternative lens for looking into Hong Kong's history by breaking away for the usual colonial and nationalist interpretations. Drawing on both English and Chinese sources, he argues that, from the early colonial era, colonial power has been extensively shared between colonizers and the Chinese who chose to work with them. This exploration of the form of colonial power includes critical discussions of various cultural and institutional aspects, looking into such issues as education, language use, political ideologies and other cultural and political concerns. These considerations permit the author to shed new light from a historical perspective on the complex and hotly debated question of Hong Kong identity. But it is not written just out of an interest in things of the past. Rather, the arguments of this book shed new light on some current issues of major relevance to post-colonial Hong Kong. In making critical use of post-colonial approaches, this book not only makes an original and important contribution to Hong Kong studies, but also makes evident that Hong Kong is an important case for all interested in examining the colonial experience in East Asia. This book is of interest to all with an interest in Hong Kong's history and current issues, but also more widely to those who study the phenomenon of colonialism in the Asian region.

eISBN: 978-988-8052-13-4
Subjects: History
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-vi)
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. vii-viii)
  3. Series Foreword
    Series Foreword (pp. ix-x)

    Most past research on Hong Kong has been generally aimed to inform a diverse audience about the place and its people. Beginning in the 1950s, the aim of scholars and journalists who came to Hong Kong was to study China, which had not yet opened its doors to fieldwork by outsiders. Accordingly, the relevance of Hong Kong was limited to its status as a society adjacent to mainland China. After the opening of China, research on Hong Kong shifted focus towards colonial legitimacy and the return of sovereignty. Thus, the disciplined study of Hong Kong was hindered for almost half...

  4. Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements (pp. xi-xii)
  5. Introduction: Coloniality and Hong Kong Chineseness
    Introduction: Coloniality and Hong Kong Chineseness (pp. 1-6)

    British imperialist forces captured Hong Kong in 1842 and ruled the place as both a free port and a colony until recently. However, in both popular and academic discourses, people have almost forgotten Hong Kong’s status as a colonial entity. Liberal-modernist historiographies of Hong Kong usually tell a romanticized story about the growth of Hong Kong, characterizing it as a utopia of laissez-faire economics — a narrative that, highly sympathetic to colonial rule, embraces the depiction of Hong Kong as a “barren-rock-turned-capitalist paradise” (Endacott 1964; Woronoff 1980; Ngo 1999: 120). It is said that Hong Kong was a desolate island before...

  6. I Collaboration and Institutions
    • 1 Social Fabric of a Collaborative Colonialism
      1 Social Fabric of a Collaborative Colonialism (pp. 9-30)

      A Victorian saying went like this: by acquiring Hong Kong, Great Britain had cut a notch in the body of China as a woodsman cuts a notch in a great oak he is presently going to fell. As a “notch,” Hong Kong, seized by the British navy in the First Opium War (1840–1842), has possessed a value that can never be measured in terms of territorial conquest. The British sought a place where they could establish an independent commercial and military base free from the bureaucratic Qing government and the Cohong system that restricted foreign trade to be conducted...

    • 2 Cultural Coloniality: The English Language and Schooling
      2 Cultural Coloniality: The English Language and Schooling (pp. 31-56)

      Poet and educationalist Chris Searle once wrote that “the English language has been a monumental force and institution of oppression and rabid exploitation throughout the 400 years of imperialist history… It was made to scorn the languages it sought to replace, and told the colonized peoples that mimicry of its primacy among languages was a necessary badge of their social mobility as well as their continued humiliation and subjection… The English language itself was the language of the master, the carrier of his arrogance and brutality” (Searle 1983: 48). Amidst Hong Kong’s post-1997 “mother-tongue” education controversies, educators in Hong Kong...

    • 3 Pedagogy of Imperialism: Indirect Rule and HKU
      3 Pedagogy of Imperialism: Indirect Rule and HKU (pp. 57-76)

      Late-nineteenth-century Hong Kong witnessed the rapid development of its English-language education. But it was also a period when many other British colonies cried out in alarm about crises in their English-language education systems. Valentine Chirol (1910), for example, reports how Macaulay’s famous Minute on Indian Education in 1835 inaugurated a highly successful system of English-language education (especially during its first three decades) that produced “men of great intellectual attainments and of high character”; yet in the wake of student-associated political agitation all over India, its English-language education system turned out to be a seedbed of discontent. According to Chirol, schools...

  7. II. Hong Kong In-Betweens
    • 4 Double Identity of the Colonial Intelligentsia: Ho Kai
      4 Double Identity of the Colonial Intelligentsia: Ho Kai (pp. 79-102)

      Postcolonial studies have dispensed much ink on the ambivalent state that colonial rule perhaps left to the colonized people in the “contact zone.” Frantz Fanon’s famous “black skin–white masks” metaphor reflects his effort to capture the miserable split identity of the colonized: he asserts that colonial authority is so overwhelmingly dominant that it works whenever colonized subjects try to mimic the colonizer’s culture. Homi Bhabha, in contrast, argues that mimicry undermines colonial authority as much as it does other in-between states of hybridization or creolization in which resistance is not just possible but always embedded, as well. In short,...

    • 5 Chinese Cultural Nationalism and Southern Localism
      5 Chinese Cultural Nationalism and Southern Localism (pp. 103-130)

      In contrast to the one-China conception in dominance now, regionalism was indeed a key theme of early Republican Chinese politics, as there was no stable central Chinese government until Chiang Kai-shek led the Northern Expedition in 1926. The lingering regional rivalries were partly a continuation of the late-Qing situation. The southern provinces, largely out of reach of Qing imperial control, could be used by various forces as testing grounds for new projects such as reformist experiments in building Western-style institutions and the revolutionary mobilization of migrants returned from overseas. In this regard, the southern provinces were the place where different...

    • 6 Cultural Cold War and the Diasporic Nation
      6 Cultural Cold War and the Diasporic Nation (pp. 131-148)

      Global politics after World War II included the decolonization of many former colonies; yet, at the same time, the global politics of this time ushered in the Cold War, which lasted for the next half century. Many former colonies fell into the categories of either developing nations or underdeveloped nations and found their independence in a world deeply divided. This state of affairs meant not so much that the former colonies would embark on autonomous development as a new kind of dependence that played into the hands of either one, or both, of the hegemonic powers. Culturally, national independence also...

  8. III. Lingering Colonialism
    • 7 Indigenizing Colonial Power and the Return to China
      7 Indigenizing Colonial Power and the Return to China (pp. 151-176)

      It is nowadays a commonplace to characterize the 1970s as a monumental break for Hong Kong. While many praise the economic take-off, quite some others point to the cultural and social transformation that happened then. The rise of political activisms and radicalisms among the university students is often referred to as an important cause of those profound changes, which gave rise to the new political outlook of the postwar’s generation of locally born Hong Kong Chinese. Their growing interest in political participation is often taken as the manifestation of an emerging local consciousness which resulted from the identity crisis that...

    • 8 Northbound Colonialism: Reinventing Hong Kong Chinese
      8 Northbound Colonialism: Reinventing Hong Kong Chinese (pp. 177-198)

      Hong Kong’s colonial subjection to the Western powers in the past has not denied the space for Chinese national identity of most of its citizens to grow and transform. The co-evolution of colonialism and Chinese nationalism, the strong continuity between nationalist and colonial governmentality, etc., have almost made themselves indistinguishable from each other in many ways. Critical scholarships, couched in all too simple binary opposite terms are, therefore, hopelessly inadequate to grasp the complexity of coloniality manifested in Hong Kong and China because dominance and resistance have always happened within an ever-changing matrix of colonial power. This is especially true...

  9. Conclusion: Re-theorizing Colonial Power
    Conclusion: Re-theorizing Colonial Power (pp. 199-210)

    As early as 1953, John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson (1953) in the article “The imperialism of free trade” criticized the classical, including Marxist, theories of imperialism for their Eurocentricity which seeks explanation for the rise of colonial empires in terms of circumstances in Europe only. Almost twenty years later, Robinson elaborated such criticism in a paper presented at a seminar on imperialism at Oxford. In that paper entitled “Non-European foundations of European imperialism: sketch for a theory of collaboration” (Robinson 1972), he writes:

    Today their analyses, deduced more from first principle than empirical observation, appear to be ideas about European...

  10. Character List
    Character List (pp. 211-214)
  11. Notes
    Notes (pp. 215-224)
  12. Bibliography
    Bibliography (pp. 225-258a)
  13. Index
    Index (pp. 259-262)
Hong Kong University Press logo