Top Down
Top Down: The Ford Foundation, Black Power, and the Reinvention of Racial Liberalism
Karen Ferguson
Series: Politics and Culture in Modern America
Copyright Date: 2013
Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press
Pages: 336
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fht6r
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Top Down
Book Description:

At first glance, the Ford Foundation and the black power movement would make an unlikely partnership. After the Second World War, the renowned Foundation was the largest philanthropic organization in the United States and was dedicated to projects of liberal reform. Black power ideology, which promoted self-determination over color-blind assimilation, was often characterized as radical and divisive. But Foundation president McGeorge Bundy chose to engage rather than confront black power's challenge to racial liberalism through an ambitious, long-term strategy to foster the "social development" of racial minorities. The Ford Foundation not only bankrolled but originated many of the black power era's hallmark legacies: community control of public schools, ghetto-based economic development initiatives, and race-specific arts and cultural organizations. In Top Down, Karen Ferguson explores the consequences of this counterintuitive and unequal relationship between the liberal establishment and black activists and their ideas. In essence, the white liberal effort to reforge a national consensus on race had the effect of remaking racial liberalism from the top down-a domestication of black power ideology that still flourishes in current racial politics. Ultimately, this new racial liberalism would help foster a black leadership class-including Barack Obama-while accommodating the intractable inequality that first drew the Ford Foundation to address the "race problem."

eISBN: 978-0-8122-0903-7
Subjects: History
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. [i]-[vi])
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. [vii]-[viii])
  3. Introduction
    Introduction (pp. 1-20)

    On August 2, 1966, McGeorge Bundy made his first major policy statement as Ford Foundation president in a speech to the National Urban League in Philadelphia. Entitled “Action for Equal Opportunity,” Bundy’s address was a clarion call for a new era at the Ford Foundation, by far the largest and most influential philanthropy in the world. Bundy declared that the Foundation’s most prestigious and costly programs would experiment boldly by dealing with the ongoing black freedom struggle, especially black power’s challenge to the nation. Pegged for Foundation president in 1965, the year of both the Voting Rights Act and the...

  4. PART I. SIZING UP THE URBAN CRISIS
    • Chapter 1 Modernizing Migrants
      Chapter 1 Modernizing Migrants (pp. 23-48)

      In 1967, the Ford Foundation’s annual report included a special message from its president, McGeorge Bundy. Writing in the context of what he termed “the terrible riots of 1967,” Bundy’s essay nevertheless put forth a relentlessly positive argument about the nation’s racial future, despite what he acknowledged were the dire facts of its past and present. Among these, he highlighted America’s long and defining history of institutionalized racial exploitation, the white backlash that had met African Americans’ freedom struggle, and the separatism of black power that marked their abandonment of the nation and its liberal promise of equality. Regardless of...

    • Chapter 2 The Social Development Solution
      Chapter 2 The Social Development Solution (pp. 49-84)

      In 1962, the Ford Foundation’s trustees released Directives and Terms of Reference for the 1960s, an implicit call to action against Henry Heald, the Foundation’s president. Heald’s conservatism and top-down management style had been very attractive to the board just a few years before in the wake of the 1950s Red Scare, but now he seemed stodgy and ill suited for stewardship of Ford’s almost limitless resources and the activist ethos of its founding mission. John F. Kennedy’s election in 1960 emboldened the Foundation trustees and the rest of the postwar liberal establishment to act on their ambitions for the...

  5. PART II. TRANSFORMING THE GHETTO
    • Chapter 3 Developmental Separatism and Community Control
      Chapter 3 Developmental Separatism and Community Control (pp. 87-129)

      When the Ford Foundation’s Fund for the Advancement of Education and the New York Board of Education joined forces in the early 1950s to deal with the “problem” of Puerto Rican migration to the city, their solution was clear. The authors of the study that resulted from their collaboration were confident that the “rapid adjustment of Puerto Rican children and parents to the community and the community to them”¹ would result from a conflict-free integration of these children into racially mixed public schools where they would have access to a wide array of cutting-edge enrichment programs aimed at their acculturation...

    • Chapter 4 Black Power and the End of Community Action
      Chapter 4 Black Power and the End of Community Action (pp. 130-166)

      In the first months of 1968, the newly elected governing board for the I.S. 201 community-control demonstration district and its recently hired administrator, Charles E. Wilson, sent the Ford Foundation’s Mario Fantini their proposal for the schools in East Harlem, along with a request for the Ford Foundation to fund and otherwise support the plan. The board, which was dominated by activists from East Harlem MEND who had been involved in the schools fight at least since the I.S. 201 controversy, was more than ready, as Wilson put it, for “the forces in favor of community control” to “take the...

  6. PART III. CULTIVATING LEADERSHIP
    • Chapter 5 Multiculturalism from Above
      Chapter 5 Multiculturalism from Above (pp. 169-209)

      On August 14, 1966, the New York Times published a guest editorial by Douglas Turner Ward, the African American playwright, director, and actor who had recently become a darling of the New York theater world. Ward’s breakthrough had come thanks not only to his undisputed talent but also to his race in a period when white audiences and critics were hungry for realistic theatrical expression of the “black experience” as a way to understand African Americans’ claims and actions in the black power era. He capitalized on this moment of white attention and the Times’s bully pulpit to make the...

    • Chapter 6 The Best and the Brightest
      Chapter 6 The Best and the Brightest (pp. 210-254)

      In January 1979, the Ford Foundation announced that Franklin Thomas would replace the retiring McGeorge Bundy as the president of the Foundation, which was still the nation’s largest and most powerful philanthropy. In making this appointment, the trustees made a monumental gesture that symbolized the culmination of Ford’s long-standing commitment to racial assimilation. Thomas was not only black but also a Foundation protégé, having spent ten years from 1967 to 1977 as the handpicked, founding president of Brooklyn’s Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation (BSRC), a demonstration by Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Ford Foundation to institutionalize establishment liberalism’s attack on the...

  7. Epilogue: The Diminishing Expectations of Racial Liberalism
    Epilogue: The Diminishing Expectations of Racial Liberalism (pp. 255-270)

    The diminution of the purview and program of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation (BSRC) matched the Foundation’s shrinking expectations for its community-development work overall. In the end, institution building and leadership development were the only concrete and lasting accomplishments of the Foundation’s efforts to build and sustain community-development corporations (CDCs), which it nevertheless celebrated as the successful culmination of its work in social development. Ford readily conceded these shortcomings in assessments of its achievements on this front, both frankly admitting the impossibility of its earlier, lofty goals in solving the urban crisis and setting more modest and cautious goals for itself...

  8. Notes
    Notes (pp. 271-312)
  9. Index
    Index (pp. 313-324)
  10. Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments (pp. 325-327)
University of Pennsylvania Press logo