Roland Barthes at the Collège de France
Roland Barthes at the Collège de France
LUCY O’MEARA
Series: Contemporary French and Francophone Cultures
Volume: 22
Copyright Date: 2012
Edition: 1
Published by: Liverpool University Press
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q
Pages: 224
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vjk9q
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Roland Barthes at the Collège de France
Book Description:

Roland Barthes at the Collège de France studies the four lecture courses given by Barthes in Paris between 1977 and 1980. This study, the first full-length account of this material, places Barthes’s teaching within institutional, intellectual and personal contexts. Analysing the texts and recordings of Comment vivre ensemble, Le Neutre and La Préparation du roman I et II in tandem with Barthes’s 1970s output, the book brings together for the first time all the strands of Barthes’s activity as writer, teacher and public intellectual. Theoretically wide-ranging in scope, Lucy O’Meara’s study focuses particularly on Barthes’s pedagogical style, addressing how his wilfully un-magisterial teaching links to the anti-systematic, anti-dogmatic goals of the rest of his work. Barthes’s methodology sought to negotiate the balance between singularity and universality, and central to this endeavour are aesthetic thought and techniques of essayism and fragmentation. Barthes’s strategies are here linked to broad intellectual influences, from the legacies of Montaigne, Kant, Schlegel and Adorno to the contemporary intellectual trends which Barthes sought to evade, and his attraction towards Eastern philosophies such as Zen and Tao. Barthes’s lectures discuss ideal forms of community life, ‘neutral’ modes of discourse and behaviour, and the idea of writing a novel. His consideration of these fantasies involves a profound exploration of the nature of literary creation, social interaction, subjectivity, and the possibility of a universal particular. Roland Barthes at the Collège de France reassesses the critical and ethical priorities of Barthes’s work in the decade before his death, demonstrating the vitally affirmative core of Barthes’s late thought.

eISBN: 978-1-84631-786-6
Subjects: Language & Literature
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-vi)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.1
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. vii-vii)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.2
  3. Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements (pp. viii-viii)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.3
  4. Note on Abbreviations and References
    Note on Abbreviations and References (pp. ix-x)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.4
  5. Introduction
    Introduction (pp. 1-26)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.5

    The shield of the Collège de France shows a book resting on a leafy background, with the legend ‘Docet Omnia’ – ‘Everything is taught’ – framed by stars. It is inlaid in the floor of the Collège’s main entrance on Rue des écoles in Paris. Elsewhere in the building, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phrase describing the institution’s promotion of experimental, unregulated teaching is carved in large gilded letters into the wall: ‘Ce que le Collège de France, depuis sa fondation, est chargé de donner à ses auditeurs, ce ne sont pas des vérités acquises, c’est l’idée d’une recherche libre’. Roland Barthes taught at the...

  6. 1 Barthes’s Heretical Teaching
    1 Barthes’s Heretical Teaching (pp. 27-51)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.6

    On 14 March 1976, Roland Barthes was elected to the ‘chaire de sémiologie littéraire’ at the Collège de France. Acceptance into the Collège comes via the approval of one’s peers and (nominally) of the Institut de France.¹ The fact that Barthes was elected by the professorial body of the Collège de France by a majority of only one vote illustrates perfectly a tension in the Collège itself between conservative and slightly more radical values: Barthes was, for many, a more controversial choice than his competitor for the chair, the semiologist Claude Bremond. His ‘présentateur’, Michel Foucault, represented the more nonconformist...

  7. 2 Leçon and ‘Longtemps, je me suis couché de bonne heure…’
    2 Leçon and ‘Longtemps, je me suis couché de bonne heure…’ (pp. 52-86)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.7

    Early inLa Chambre claire, Barthes explains that in his writing he has always hovered between two sorts of discourse; he feels the ‘inconfort’ of a subject ‘ballotté entre deux langages, l’un expressif, l’autre critique’. His only sense of certainty, within the network of discourses in which he finds himself, is that he feels an ineradicable ‘résistance […] à tout système réducteur’ (CC, 794).¹ His own subjectivity, ‘“l’antique souveraineté du moi” (Nietzsche)’, must be used as a methodological starting-point. Selecting the photographs he would use for the book, Barthes had the ‘bizarre’ thought that perhaps, after all, it is by...

  8. 3 Comment vivre ensemble, Le Neutre and their Context
    3 Comment vivre ensemble, Le Neutre and their Context (pp. 87-117)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.8

    At the end of his inaugural lecture, Barthes states that the time has come for him to teach in a particular way: ‘Vient peut-être maintenant l’âge d’une autre expérience: celle dedésapprendre’. The first two lecture series at the Collège de France quite obviously stage this ‘désapprentissage’, forming a sprawling, deliberately unauthoritative constellation of areas of knowledge. Barthes’s fantasies of the ideals of the ‘vivre-ensemble’ and the ‘neutre’ are sketched by recourse to a heterogeneous corpus of texts, and the exposition of his own views is intercut throughout by the aleatory method employed, and by exhortations to the listeners to...

  9. 4 Japonisme and Minimal Existence in the Cours
    4 Japonisme and Minimal Existence in the Cours (pp. 118-162)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.9

    Throughout Barthes’sCoursat the Collège de France we see several profound themes that reveal the influence of Oriental thought as imported into the West largely by Alan Watts and D.T. Suzuki.¹ Barthes’s sketching of the haiku as leading to an aesthetic experience which overcomes the sense of division between one’s self and one’s environment; his suggestions that we conceptualise space and time differently; his digressive, incomplete methods of exposition; and his espousal of ‘suspension’ because of his reluctance to be pinned to a specific subject-position, all stem in part from his fascination with Taoist thought and Japanese aesthetics. He...

  10. 5 La Préparation du roman: The Novel and the Fragment
    5 La Préparation du roman: The Novel and the Fragment (pp. 163-199)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.10

    Mid-way through his four-year tenure at the Collège de France, Barthes seeks a new form for his writing. As we have seen, his sense that a transformation of his writing is required is crystallised in a moment occurring on 15 April 1978, which he characterises as a ‘sorte deSatori’ (PR, 32). The new form of writing fantasised by Barthes involves a productive tension between the aesthetic minimalism of the haiku and the maximalism of the ‘grande œuvre’ as exemplified byÀ la Recherche du temps perdu: ‘Proust et le haïku se croisent’ (PR, 99). As Kuki points out, though...

  11. Afterword
    Afterword (pp. 200-204)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.11

    At the opening ofL’Entretien infini, Maurice Blanchot points out that Nietzsche’s fragmentary approach to writing is inconsistent with the requirements of the academy, which demands that research be presented in a continuous and developmental form. ‘Nietzsche […] fut professeur’, writes Blanchot,

    [mais] il dut renoncer à l’être et pour diverses raisons, dont l’une est révélatrice: comment sa pensée voyageuse qui s’accomplit par fragments, c’est-à-dire par affirmations séparées et exigeant la séparation, commentAinsi parlait Zarathoustraauraient-ils pu prendre place dans l’enseignement et s’accorder avec les nécessités de la parole universitaire?¹

    The questions asked here of Nietzsche could equally be...

  12. Appendix: List of Roland Barthes’s Seminars and Lecture Courses at the École pratique des hautes études and the Collège de France, 1963–1980
    Appendix: List of Roland Barthes’s Seminars and Lecture Courses at the École pratique des hautes études and the Collège de France, 1963–1980 (pp. 205-206)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.12
  13. Bibliography
    Bibliography (pp. 207-219)
    Roland Barthes
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.13
  14. Index
    Index (pp. 220-224)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjk9q.14
Liverpool University Press logo