Red Apple: Communism and McCarthyism in Cold War New York
Red Apple: Communism and McCarthyism in Cold War New York
PHILLIP DEERY
Copyright Date: 2014
Published by: Fordham University Press
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd
Pages: 240
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x00nd
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Red Apple: Communism and McCarthyism in Cold War New York
Book Description:

Set against a backdrop of mounting anti-communism, Red Apple documents the personal, physical, and mental effects of McCarthyism on six political activists with ties to New York City. From the late 1940s through the 1950s, McCarthyism disfigured the American political landscape. Under the altar of anticommunism, domestic Cold War crusaders undermined civil liberties, curtailed equality before the law, and tarnished the ideals of American democracy. In order to preserve freedom, they jettisoned some of its tenets. Congressional committees worked in tandem, although not necessarily in collusion, with the FBI, law firms, university administrations, publishing houses, television networks, movie studios, and a legion of government agencies at the federal, state, and local levels to target "subversive" individuals. Exploring the human consequences of the widespread paranoia that gripped a nation, Red Apple presents the international and domestic context for the experiences of these individuals: the House Un-American Activities Committee, hearings of the Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee, resulting in the incarceration of its chairman, Dr. Edward Barsky, and its executive board; the academic freedom cases of two New York University professors, Lyman Bradley and Edwin Burgum, culminating in their dismissal from the university; the blacklisting of the communist writer Howard Fast and his defection from American communism; the visit of an anguished Dimitri Shostakovich to New York in the spring of 1949; and the attempts by O. John Rogge, the Committee's lawyer, to find a "third way" in the quest for peace, which led detractors to question which side he was on. Examining real-life experiences at the "ground level," Deery explores how these six individuals experienced, responded to, and suffered from one of the most savage assaults on civil liberties in American history. Their collective stories illuminate the personal costs of holding dissident political beliefs in the face of intolerance and moral panic that is as relevant today as it was seventy years ago.

eISBN: 978-0-8232-5448-4
Subjects: Political Science
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-vi)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.1
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. vii-viii)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.2
  3. List of Abbreviations
    List of Abbreviations (pp. ix-x)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.3
  4. Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments (pp. xi-xiv)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.4
  5. Introduction
    Introduction (pp. 1-10)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.5

    On November 13, 1950, a fifty-six-year-old woman waved goodbye to a handful of supporters, surrendered to the custody of a U.S. marshal, and was committed to the District of Columbia jail in Washington. She was then incarcerated at the Federal Reformatory for Women in Alderston, West Virginia, for a period of three months. Helen Reid Bryan was a Quaker. In her lowly paid role as administrative secretary in an organization deemed “subversive,” she had refused, as a matter of principle, to hand over the organization’s records to the House Committee on Un-American Activities. This was her crime. Eight years later,...

  6. 1 The Doctor: Edward Barsky
    1 The Doctor: Edward Barsky (pp. 11-38)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.6

    On May 4, 1949, Dr. Edward K. Barsky received some reassuring news. His reappointment as surgeon at Beth Israel Hospital in New York City, where he had worked since 1923, had been confirmed for another two years. Twelve months later, he received some disturbing news that changed his life forever: he learned that the U.S. Supreme Court had upheld a decision that he should serve a six-month sentence in a federal penitentiary. Accordingly, he became Prisoner No. 18907. Upon his release, he learned that his license to practice medicine would be revoked. These misfortunes had nothing to do with medical...

  7. 2 The Writer: Howard Fast
    2 The Writer: Howard Fast (pp. 39-74)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.7

    During the early years of the Cold War, Howard Fast, born in New York City in 1914, was one of America’s most celebrated novelists. Until his resignation in 1957, Howard Fast was the single most important literary figure in the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA).¹ The first of his sixty-five novels was published in 1933, when he was eighteen. WhenCitizen Tom Paineappeared in 1943, he was regarded as “one of the few major American novelists.”² According to an American academic who visited the Soviet Union in 1956, “the name of Howard Fast was on...

  8. 3 The Professors: Bradley and Burgum
    3 The Professors: Bradley and Burgum (pp. 75-112)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.8

    On Monday, April 16, 1951, Professor Lyman Bradley received a telegram from James L. Madden, the Acting Chancellor of New York University. It informed Bradley that the University Council had resolved “to remove you from the faculty of New York University.”¹ We do not know which emotion Bradley most felt when he read the telegram that day: astonishment, anger, despondency, or bitterness. But we do know that the genesis of his dismissal lay in events external to the university and that had commenced six years earlier. Eighteen months later, on October 13, 1952, another telegram was delivered from NYU. It...

  9. 4 The Composer: Dimitri Shostakovich
    4 The Composer: Dimitri Shostakovich (pp. 113-134)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.9

    At New York’s opulent Waldorf Astoria hotel in March 1949, the internationally famous Soviet composer Dimitri Shostakovich experienced “the worst moment in my life.”¹ His nadir occurred when he was asked publicly if he supportedPravda’srecent denunciation of several Russian composers.² Forty years later, the American playwright Arthur Miller still remembered that moment: “It is the memory of Shostakovich that still haunts my mind when I think of that day.”³ William Barrett saw him as “unhappy” and “nervous,”⁴ while to Nicolas Nabokov “he seemed like a trapped man.”⁵ According to another participant at that conference, Dwight Macdonald, Shostakovich was...

  10. 5 The Lawyer: O. John Rogge
    5 The Lawyer: O. John Rogge (pp. 135-158)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.10

    For three long years, a New York lawyer, O. John Rogge, assiduously defended the Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee (JAFRC). Although he could not save its executive board from the federal penitentiary, the reputation of Rogge as a lawyer with a high public profile and an established record of activism in both legal and political circles remained intact. Before Barsky, Bradley, Bryan, and Fast were imprisoned, Rogge was an invited speaker at the Waldorf conference in March 1949, at which Dimitri Shostakovich was the drawcard. After they were imprisoned, he was again on the hustings, invited by the Joint Committee for...

  11. Conclusion
    Conclusion (pp. 159-164)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.11

    “The Un-American hearings were held last week,” wrote Jessica Mitford on December 10, 1953. “You can’t imagine how revolting they are. They dragged about 100 people into it … just about every kind of person you can imagine.”¹ Mitford, a member of the Communist Party in California who had already appeared before HUAC in September 1951, says little more in her letters about the direct impact of McCarthyism. Each of the Americans whose stories are told in this book had previously confronted HUAC, and it was no less “revolting.” Unlike Mitford, most lost their jobs. But as with Mitford, the...

  12. Notes
    Notes (pp. 165-234)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.12
  13. Bibliography
    Bibliography (pp. 235-246)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.13
  14. Index
    Index (pp. 247-254)
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x00nd.14
Fordham University Press logo