Skip to Main Content
Have library access? Log in through your library
After God: Richard Kearney and the Religious Turn in Continental Philosophy

After God: Richard Kearney and the Religious Turn in Continental Philosophy

Edited by JOHN PANTELEIMON MANOUSSAKIS
John D. Caputo series editor
Copyright Date: 2006
Published by: Fordham University Press
Pages: 464
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x0741
  • Cite this Item
  • Book Info
    After God: Richard Kearney and the Religious Turn in Continental Philosophy
    Book Description:

    Who or what comes after God? In the wake of God, as the last fifty years of philosophy has shown, God comes back again, otherwise: Heidegger's last God, Levinas's God of Infinity, Derrida's and Caputo's tout autre, Marion's God without Being, Kearney's God who may be. Sharing the common problematic of the otherness of the Other, the essays in this volume represent considered responses to the recent work of Richard Kearney.John Panteleimon Manoussakis holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from Boston College. He is the author of Theos Philosophoumenos (in Greek, Athens 2004) and co-editor of Heidegger and the Greeks (with Drew Hyland). He has also translated Heidegger's Aufenthalte.

    eISBN: 978-0-8232-4739-4
    Subjects: Philosophy

Table of Contents

Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
  1. Front Matter
    (pp. i-vi)
  2. Table of Contents
    (pp. vii-x)
  3. Acknowledgments
    (pp. xi-xii)
  4. Abbreviations
    (pp. xiii-xiv)
  5. Introduction
    (pp. xv-xx)
    JOHN PANTELEIMON MANOUSSAKIS

    So here we are, like Moses,afterGod.

    All the texts in this volume share, in one way or another, the adverbial ambiguity ofafter. The God they seek—the God they are after—is a God who can be seen ‘‘only from behind,’’ that is, without being seen, in the blindness of vision, at the limits of the phenomenological horizon. This is a God who, for several of our contributors, can be known only through the dark cloud of not-knowing. A God who can be named only through the paradox of a name that refers back to itself, without...

  6. Part One: The Return to the Eschaton

    • Epiphanies of the Everyday: Toward a Micro-Eschatology
      (pp. 3-20)
      RICHARD KEARNEY

      What if we were to return to epiphanies of the everyday? What if we could come back to the end (eschaton) in the here and now? Back to that end after the end of time that addresses us in each instant? What if we could rediscover ourselves again face-to-face with the infinite in the infinitesimal? Touch the sacred enfolded in the seeds of ordinary things?

      Such a return would invite us to experience the ultimate in the mundane. The first in the last. The most in the least. It would bring us into dialogue with those who seek the divine...

    • Toward a Fourth Reduction?
      (pp. 21-34)
      JOHN PANTELEIMON MANOUSSAKIS

      In this essay we attempt a redefining of the phenomenological method as this has been developed mainly through three “reductions”¹ represented by three thinkers whose work advanced phenomenological research in novel ways: Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Luc Marion. Our rehearsal of the phenomenological tradition aims at formulating a set of controversial questions: Is it, perhaps, time for afourthreduction that would better serve the sensibilities of the so-called phenomenology of the apparent? And if so, what might be its guiding principles, its ways of operating, its scope and aim? Such a fourth reduction, we believe, would not seek...

  7. Part Two: The Possible:: Between Being and God

    • I. PHILOSOPHY FACING THEOLOGY

      • Enabling God
        (pp. 39-54)
        RICHARD KEARNEY

        The title of this essay—“Enabling God”—can be read both ways. God enabling us, us enabling God. As such, it affirms the freedom that characterizes our relationship to the divine as a mutual act of giving. So doing, it challenges traditional concepts of God as omnipotence. The notion of an all-powerful, autonomous, and self-sufficient deity has a long history ranging from the self-thinking-thought of Aristotelian ontology to the self-subsisting-act (ipsum esse subsistens) or self-causing-cause (ens causa sui) of medieval scholasticism and modern rationalism (Spinoza, Leibniz). It is a powerful lineage pertaining to a powerful concept of a powerful God....

      • Maybe, Maybe Not: Richard Kearney and God
        (pp. 55-77)
        WILLIAM DESMOND

        Richard Kearney displays an enviable range of concerns in the embarrassment of riches that he offers to us with his three most recent books.¹ Each book asks for careful attention in its own right, though each contributes in a distinctive register to a larger project which goes under the titlePhilosophy at the Limit. Not unexpectedly, there is some seepage among the three books, for the sense of limit that emerges is a porous one. Thus the emphasis on stories is evident in all three books, while the themes treated inStrangers, Gods, and Monstersappear in some of the...

      • Hermeneutics and the God of Promise
        (pp. 78-93)
        MEROLD WESTPHAL

        InThe God Who May Be, Richard Kearney has given us a gift whose power to provoke thought is out of proportion to its small size. Its opening sentences read as follows: “God neither is nor is not but may be. That is my thesis in this volume. What I mean by this is that God, who is traditionally thought of as act or actuality, might better be rethought as possibility. To this end I am proposing here a new hermeneutics of religion which explores and evaluates two rival ways of interpreting the divine—theeschatologicaland theonto-theological.”¹

        Before...

      • Kearney’s Wager
        (pp. 94-103)
        PATRICK BURKE

        In a 1991 essay, Dominique Janicaud lamented a “turn” in recent French phenomenology “toward the theological,” toward the question of the nature of postmetaphysical divinity. In 1984, Richard Kearney had publishedPoétique du Possible: Phénoménologie Herméneutique de la Figuration, in which he had already mapped a new eschatological hermeneutics of God as possibility in critical comparison with Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics of being asVermögend-Mögende. Kearney continues to situate his own work within this turn, arguing that the dialogue between postmodern philosophy and religion is “one of the most burning intellectual tasks of our time.” InThe God Who May Be,...

      • Is the Possible Doing Justice to God?
        (pp. 104-110)
        DOMINIQUE JANICAUD

        I would have preferred not to speakofGod. I don’t deny the possibility of speakingtoGod; the great Judeo-Christian tradition has done it and still does. But speakingofGod is particularly risky in philosophy, by using ideas, concepts, and categories that might turn out to be irrelevant to God (or not worthy of Him).

        I hope He will forgive me nevertheless, for speakingofHim in this chapter, taking into account the fact that this is a reply to a friend of mine whom I like and sincerely admire. Long before Heidegger asked, “How does the deity...

      • The God Who May Be and the God Who Was
        (pp. 111-126)
        CRAIG NICHOLS

        In the context of the reductive paradigm inspired by Husserl’s phenomenological method, Richard Kearney proposes a return (reducere) to the face-to-face encounter withexistencethrough, after, and indeed even in the preceding reductive stages that have highlighted a return to essence (Husserl), being (Heidegger), and the pure gift (Marion et al.). This “fourth reduction” advocates a new vision of transcendence (quaeschaton) in ordinary experience—but not simply a generic form of transcendence that cares not which finite forms it assumes. Rather, it makes an ethical claim through the face (prosopon) of the other revealed in every encounter with finite...

      • Christianity and Possibility
        (pp. 127-138)
        JEFFREY BLOECHL

        We do not yet know what it means to speak of the death of God, and not only because those who speak of it do not always have the same thing in mind. The simplest controversy is also the weightiest, and still the most painful: Is it only a persistent idol that dies, or must it be religion itself, as the practice of idolatry? Do the fires of suspicion only purify, or do they consume everything that touches them? What religion, if any, survives the fever of Sils Maria and Turin?

        Even while many of us struggle with that sort...

      • Quis ergo Amo cum Deum Meum Amo?
        (pp. 139-154)
        BRIAN TREANOR

        Continental philosophy, since the work of Emmanuel Levinas, has been marked by a particular concern with otherness. Although this concern is expressed in a variety of ways—the Infinite, the Other, the impossible, and so on—each of these expressions orients itself around the absolute incommensurability of the other (autre) with the self:

        [It] is of importance to emphasize that the transcendence of the Infinite with respect to the I which is separated from it and which it thinks it measures (so to speak) its very infinitude. The distance that separates theideatumand idea here constitutes the content of...

      • Divinity and Alterity
        (pp. 155-164)
        FELIX Ó MURCHADHA

        Divinity and alterity have haunted phenomenology since its beginnings. At phenomenology’s margins Rudolf Otto described God as the “wholly other.”¹ This otherness of God and the divinity of otherness came into sharp relief in Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology, where God’s transcendence is bracketed as much as the alterity of the other in the reduction of intentional consciousness.² This is a move replicated in Heidegger’s “reduction,” to use the vocabulary of Marion which is employed in this volume by Kearney and Manoussakis, where the question of God depends on the analytic ofDasein.³ Arguably in both Husserl and the early Heidegger the...

    • II. THEOLOGY FACING PHILOSOPHY

      • On the God of the Possible
        (pp. 167-184)
        STANISLAS BRETON

        Under a title that captures our attention and puts a question that will not go away, Richard Kearney offers a conception of the divine and of divinity that immediately strikes the reader by its extraordinary youthfulness. For youth, not only in its most current sense, but in its most philosophical as well, could be defined precisely by the two words in his title that open the new perspective to which he summons us:may be. How should we translate—in a way that allows us to dream, as if finding ourselves on Celtic ground—the “potency to be” indicated by...

      • Questions to and from a Tradition in Disarray
        (pp. 185-207)
        JOSEPH S. O’LEARY

        “Of all points of faith, the being of a God is, to my own apprehension, encompassed with most difficulty, and borne in upon our minds with most power” (Newman,Apologia, chap. 5). The biblical idea of God as Judge and Redeemer is borne in on our minds by moral experience, our sense of sin and desire of forgiveness, and also by religious experience. But the old sturdy confidence in the reality of God as creator of heaven and earth, attested by cosmic order and the very movement of the rational mind, has been depleted. If God cannot be spoken of...

      • Mystic Maybes
        (pp. 208-221)
        KEVIN HART

        Matthew Arnold “objected to our carrying on a flirtation with mystic maybe’s and calling it Religion.”¹ Why should Augustine Birrill’s words, occasioned by the death of Arnold, come to mind when I read Richard Kearney’sThe God Who May Be?Perhaps because Arnold and Kearney share a common purpose: dissociating metaphysics and the Bible. InLiterature and Dogma(1873), Arnold seeks to show us that “when we come to put the right construction on the Bible, we give to the Bible a real experimental basis, and keep on this basis throughout.”² In so doing, he thinks, we distance ourselves from...

      • The Maker Mind and Its Shade
        (pp. 222-230)
        JEAN GREISCH

        Richard Kearney and I have a common interest in Heidegger’s existential and ontological understanding of the “possible,” which moves far beyond the classical and modern logic of modalities and Nicolai Hartmann’s modal ontology. Heidegger’s statement that “the possible is more real than the real” (Being and Time, §31) could be augmented by Paul Celan’s beautiful verse, “Alles ist weniger als es ist, alles ist mehr” (Everything is less than it is, everything is more). If I understand Kearney correctly, this statement must not be restricted toDasein’s being-in-the-world and its finite self-understanding, but is also true of God’s divinity.

        In...

      • Divine Metaxology
        (pp. 231-240)
        JAMES OLTHUIS

        Richard Kearney is a possibility thinker, a philosopher, novelist, and poet fired by a passion for/of God. For Kearney, philosophy links imagination and affectivity with reason in a rhetoric of persuasion aiming for individual and societal transfiguration. In other words, as I read him, philosophy is not an abstract-theoretical exercise dedicated to getting things straight, finding solutions for particular theoretic problems. Rather, for Kearney, philosophy is a way of life, a spiritual exercise¹ working toward the incitement of passion for visionary transformation and cultural change rather than the elaboration of grand systems and the elimination of paradoxes. Indeed, it is...

      • Theopoetics of the Possible
        (pp. 241-269)
        B. KEITH PUTT

        Theology is a cartography (that is, an attempt to create maps, to mark out, to graph, or to plot a course or courses) that will lead to a place, atopos, where divine revelation may occur and knowledge of God may be discovered. At these various places (topoi) and through its various topics, theology concerns the “way,” the right way, the proper way,theway, or one of many ways that can lead individuals to know something about God. Yet, as Gregory so honestly affirms, the journey to such knowledge, the progressing along various chosen ways to God, always occurs...

      • Is God Diminished If We Abscond?
        (pp. 270-278)
        MARK PATRICK HEDERMAN

        Throughout his trilogy Philosophy at the Limit, Richard Kearney leads us “on the sinuous paths through postmodernity and beyond.” Calling on the messenger god, Hermes, he pioneers a new way of interpreting three of the defining contours of our third-millennial profile: strangers, gods, and monsters, three different names for our experience of alterity and otherness. The three volumes, if you take them not in chronological order but in order of accessibility, could be said to follow a technique similar to that used by Kierkegaard. The latter’sJournal of a Seducerwas a best-selling page-turner available even in railway stations. It...

      • Prosopon and Icon: Two Premodern Ways of Thinking God
        (pp. 279-298)
        JOHN PANTELEIMON MANOUSSAKIS

        Aristotle, in distinguishing between actuality (ἐνέργεια) and possibility (δύναμις), undertook two crucial steps that have haunted the history of Western metaphysics ever since: he gave a qualitative priority to actuality over potency, and then he identified the former with pure essence. Possibility, for Aristotle, is a mode that denotes transition and corruption, and thus imperfection. However, the risk that he acknowledges and fears most is that potency is ambiguous and undecidable. In his words, “the possible could be both a being and a non-being … it could equally be both things and neither” (1050b10, 1051a1). It is thiscoincidentia oppositorum...

  8. Part Three: Recapitulations

    • Desire of God: An Exchange
      (pp. 301-308)
      JACQUES DERRIDA, JOHN D. CAPUTO and RICHARD KEARNEY

      Kearney: Derrida’s own response to the postmodern dilemma of undecidability would seem to be twofold—believeandread! In spite of our inability to know for sure “who speaks” behind the many voices and visages that float before us—now present, now absent; now here, now elsewhere—Derrida tells us that we must continue to trust and have faith. “Je ne sais pas, il faut croire,” as the refrain ofMemoirs of the Blindgoes. But if our belief is blind, and each moment of faithful decision terrifying, Derrida suggests that we can always be helped by the vigilant practice...

    • Richard Kearney’s Enthusiasm
      (pp. 309-317)
      JOHN D. CAPUTO

      Richard Kearney is a genuine “enthusiast,” in the genuine sense of the word. His writings are contagiously enthusiastic, charged and exciting, moving and inciting, full of prayers and tears. His beautiful and powerful prose is a perfect testimony to what his friend Seamus Heaney meant when Heaney said that the Irish are a people who took over their invader’s tongue and improved it for them. His thoughts dance; his erudition dazzles us. His imagination, his favorite theme, races ahead of the rest of us who are left in his dust. An insightful reader of Levinas, Kearney has a glorious and...

    • Hermeneutics of Revelation
      (pp. 318-339)
      JEAN-LUC MARION and RICHARD KEARNEY

      Kearney: There are many similarities between your work, Jean-Luc, and mine: we both owe a great deal of our philosophical formation to the phenomenologies of Husserl and Heidegger; we have both engaged ourselves in close dialogue with Levinas, Ricoeur, and Derrida. Given these evident similarities, it would be more fruitful and interesting, it seems to me, if we take a look here into some of thedifferencesin our respective positions in regard to the phenomenology of God. One question that I would like to put to you, Jean Luc, and which, in fact, I have put in a more...

    • God: The Possible/Impossible
      (pp. 340-354)
      DAVID TRACY and Christian Sheppard

      Sheppard: Before discussing this new book,The God Who May Be: A Hermeneutics of Religion(Indiana University Press, 2001), please comment on Richard Kearney’s work up until this point.

      Tracy: He’s a remarkable philosopher. He reminds me of Blanchot and Sartre in that he has written on narrative and metaphor (and hermeneutics), and he has also written some very fine novels. He is also a remarkable interviewer. He asks questions in order to really understand what someone is thinking, and thus is able to draw them out and get them to say things that perhaps they wouldn’t otherwise. As a...

    • Kearney’s Endless Morning
      (pp. 355-361)
      CATHERINE KELLER

      In at least two registers—one of genre and one of doctrine—Richard Kearney’s philosophical theology appears suddenly and luminously at the forefront of theology itself. In other words, it invokes a “possible God,” and thus a possible theology. Theology has wanted the fully actual, active God, however, not a possible one—and so has generated an impossible one. The possible God suggests a third space, indeed a certain kind ofposseof theology itself, a “paradox of future anteriority” (Kearney’s Levinas) for a freshly Christian sense of eschatological possibility. Responding to his work mainly by way of his Villanova...

    • Reflecting God
      (pp. 362-364)
      SALLIE McFAGUE

      Kearney’s hermeneutics of religion might be called a “covenantal process view without the metaphysics” or, perhaps more accurately, with only intimations of metaphysics. The ontological claim isthere—God is coming, will come, can come—but only if we help God come, only if we do our part by witnessing to love and justice in the world. The relations between God and human beings are built on invitation and response, on the possibilities the divine offers us and our acceptance of these possibilities as our life vocation. “If we are waiting for God, God is waiting for us” (“Re-Imagining God,”...

    • In Place of a Response
      (pp. 365-388)
      RICHARD KEARNEY and Mark Manolopoulos

      Manolopoulos: In your debate with Derrida and Marion, “On the Gift” (Villanova, 1997), you ask the question “Is there a Christian philosophy of the gift?”¹ Do you think either Derrida or Marion provides handy directions? Could you summarize or interpret their insights? And whose argument do you personally find more persuasive?

      Kearney: They did avoid the question. In Derrida’s case that is logical because he will always—reasonably, for a deconstructionist— try to avoid tying the messianicity of the gift to any specific messianism as such, be it Christian, Jewish, Islamic, or any other kind. So it makes sense for...

  9. Notes
    (pp. 389-430)
  10. Contributors
    (pp. 431-436)
  11. Index
    (pp. 437-440)
  12. Back Matter
    (pp. 441-443)