Writing Revolution
Writing Revolution: Aesthetics and Politics in Hawthorne, Whitman, and Thoreau
Peter J. Bellis
Copyright Date: 2003
Published by: University of Georgia Press
Pages: 232
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n9t2
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Writing Revolution
Book Description:

In recent years, formalist and deconstructive approaches to literary studies have been under attack, charged by critics with isolating texts as distinctive aesthetic or linguistic objects, separate from their social and historical contexts. Historicist and cultural approaches have often responded by simply reversing the picture, reducing texts to no more than superstructural effects of historical or ideological forces. In Writing Revolution, Peter J. Bellis explores the ways in which literature can engage with-rather than escape from or obscure-social and political issues. Bellis argues that a number of nineteenth-century American writers, including Nathaniel Hawthorne, Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman, saw their texts as spaces where alternative social and cultural possibilities could be suggested and explored. All writing in the same historical moment, Bellis's subjects were responding to the same cluster of issues: the need to redefine American identity after the Revolution, the problem of race slavery, and the growing industrialization of American society. Hawthorne, Bellis contends, sees the romance as "neutral territory" where the Imaginary and the Actual-the aesthetic and the historical-can interpenetrate and address crucial issues of class, race, and technological modernity. Whitman conceives of Leaves of Grass as a transformative democratic space where all forms of meditation, both political and literary, are swept away. Thoreau oscillates between these two approaches. Walden, like the romance, aims to fashion a mediating space between nature and society. His abolitionist essays, however, shift sharply away from both linguistic representation and the political, toward an apocalyptic cleansing violence. In addition to covering selected works by Hawthorne, Whitman, and Thoreau, Bellis also examines powerful works of social and political critique by Louisa May Alcott and Margaret Fuller. With its suggestions for new ways of reading antebellum American writing, Writing Revolution breaks through the thickets of contemporary literary discourse and will spark debate in the literary community.

eISBN: 978-0-8203-2720-4
Subjects: Language & Literature
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-iv)
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. v-vi)
  3. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (pp. vii-x)
  4. INTRODUCTION. The Eighteenth Brumaire and the Magic Lantern
    INTRODUCTION. The Eighteenth Brumaire and the Magic Lantern (pp. 1-14)

    My objective here, put in its broadest terms, is to think about the ways in which literature can engage with or act upon the world. No act of representation, whether political or discursive, is ever simple; each transforms or displaces its object in some fashion. But representations—and aesthetic representations in particular—are nevertheless often consigned to second-order or derivative status in relation to their “originals.”

    In literary studies, formalist and deconstructive readings have been under attack for some years now, charged with isolating texts as distinctive aesthetic or linguistic objects from their social and historical contexts. But historicist and...

  5. Part One. Hawthorne
    • ONE Hawthorne’s Drama of Revolt
      ONE Hawthorne’s Drama of Revolt (pp. 17-29)

      Written in 1828 or 1829, “My Kinsman, Major Molineux” is one of Hawthorne’s earliest tales. But even here, two decades before The Scarlet Letter, he has begun to develop the conception of romance that he will elaborate and build on in his later novels.

      The story’s events take place, Hawthorne notes again and again, in moonlight rather than daylight. Here, as throughout his work, Hawthorne associates the romance not with daylight order but with the opposing or subversive force of moonlight.¹ In “The Custom-House,” he speaks of romance as “a neutral territory”; but it is also an unsettled, altered space,...

    • TWO Mauling Governor Pyncheon
      TWO Mauling Governor Pyncheon (pp. 30-50)

      Hawthorne offers several different definitions of the romance; perhaps the best known are those in his first two novels, The Scarlet Letter and The House of the Seven Gables. There is, however, at least one key difference between these definitions—a difference that suggests both Hawthorne’s own political ambivalence and the flexibility of the romance as a form.

      In “The Custom-House,” where Hawthorne delineates the “neutral territory” of romance, his image for this territory is “a familiar room,” illuminated “distinctly,” but differently, by moonlight, which now invests it with “a quality of strangeness and remoteness.”¹ The tableau is a domestic...

    • THREE Moonshine and Masquerade
      THREE Moonshine and Masquerade (pp. 51-66)

      “ ‘Moonlight, and the sentiment in man’s heart, responsive to it, is the greatest of renovators and reformers,’ ” Holgrave remarks, “ ‘And all other reform and renovation, I suppose, will prove to be no better than moonshine!’ ” (2:214). The daguerreotypist’s distinction is a crucial one for Hawthorne’s romance—that between the real reforming power of “moonlight” and the pleasant illusion of mere “moonshine.” In The Blithedale Romance, published only a year after The House of the Seven Gables, Hawthorne’s view has darkened considerably; here reform is just illusion, moonlight and moonshine one and the same.

      The House of...

  6. Part Two. Whitman
    • FOUR Whitman in 1855: Against Representation
      FOUR Whitman in 1855: Against Representation (pp. 69-101)

      Of the twelve poems in the first edition of Leaves of Grass, only one had previously appeared in print. An early version of “Europe: The 72d and 73d Years of These States,” entitled “ Resurgemus,” had been published in the June 21, 1850, edition of the New York Tribune. Whitman’s choice of this particular poem to revise and reprint is significant, for it is one of his more openly political ones—a response to the failed European revolts of 1848 and 1849. Beyond this, his choice of a final title both reinforces the poem’s historical reference and places it in...

    • FIVE 1856 and After
      FIVE 1856 and After (pp. 102-118)

      In the 1856 edition of Leaves of Grass, Whitman gives its longest poem (“Song of Myself”) the title “Poem of Walt Whitman, an American.”¹ The phrasing still preserves a duality: “Walt Whitman” is both the poem’s source and subject. But it is now classed as a poem, a linguistic artifact that comes between Whitman and the reader. So, too, where America was declared to be itself a poem in 1855, now “an American” and a “poem” seem to be quite different things. From the very outset of this edition—in the table of contents—poetic language is already granted less...

  7. Part Three. Thoreau
    • SIX To Reconcile the People and the Stones
      SIX To Reconcile the People and the Stones (pp. 121-141)

      In the preceding chapters, I have traced the shifts in Hawthorne’s and Whitman’s views of literary representation by discussing their works in chronological sequence. The former, I have suggested, abandons the image of romance as dramatic middle ground after The House of the Seven Gables, while the latter falls back into a version of poetry as mediation in “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry,” after having earlier sought to supersede representation altogether.

      Henry David Thoreau shows an even deeper ambivalence about the status of writing, one that leads him to both assert and deny the efficacy of literary mediation—in works of the...

    • SEVEN Division and Revenge
      SEVEN Division and Revenge (pp. 142-152)

      Tucked away at the end of each volume of the Princeton edition of Thoreau’s journals is a long list of cross-references linking passages from the journals to sections of his published works. These lists reveal an interesting pattern: Thoreau drew freely and widely from his journals for material for Walden and the Week, ranging across a decade’s worth of entries; but he worked quite differently in composing his abolitionist essays. None of the journals from 1842–49 provides any material at all for “Resistance to Civil Government.”¹ There are drafts of passages from “Slavery in Massachusetts” (in 1851 and 1854)...

  8. CONCLUSION. Civil Wars
    CONCLUSION. Civil Wars (pp. 153-178)

    If, as I have argued, Thoreau’s “Plea for Captain John Brown” looks toward the Civil War as an apocalyptic transformation, Hawthorne sees the war in cataclysmic terms as well. In the preface to Our Old Home, he uses the image of a “hurricane,” whose force compels him to abandon romance writing altogether: it is “sweeping us all along with it, possibly, into a Limbo where our nation and its polity may be as literally the fragments of a shattered dream as my unwritten Romance.”¹ Romance and political reality come together here, but in a disastrous mutual disintegration. For Hawthorne, too,...

  9. NOTES
    NOTES (pp. 179-202)
  10. BIBLIOGRAPHY
    BIBLIOGRAPHY (pp. 203-212)
  11. INDEX
    INDEX (pp. 213-221)
University of Georgia Press logo