Up from the Mudsills of Hell
Up from the Mudsills of Hell: The Farmers' Alliance, Populism, and Progressive Agriculture in Tennessee, 1870-1915
CONNIE L. LESTER
Copyright Date: 2006
Published by: University of Georgia Press
Pages: 336
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46nhgx
Search for reviews of this book
Book Info
Up from the Mudsills of Hell
Book Description:

Up from the Mudsills of Hell analyzes agrarian activism in Tennessee from the 1870s to 1915 within the context of farmers' lives, community institutions, and familial and communal networks. Locating the origins of the agrarian movements in the state's late antebellum and post-Civil War farm economy, Connie Lester traces the development of rural reform from the cooperative efforts of the Grange, the Agricultural Wheel, and the Farmers' Alliance through the insurgency of the People's Party and the emerging rural bureaucracy of the Cooperative Extension Service and the Tennessee Department of Agriculture. Lester ties together a rich and often contradictory history of cooperativism, prohibition, disfranchisement, labor conflicts, and third-party politics to show that Tennessee agrarianism was more complex and threatening to the established political and economic order than previously recognized. As farmers reached across gender, racial, and political boundaries to create a mass movement, they shifted the ground under the monoliths of southern life. Once the Democratic Party had destroyed the insurgency, farmers responded in both traditional and progressive ways. Some turned inward, focusing on a localism that promoted--sometimes through violence--rigid adherence to established social boundaries. Others, however, organized into the Farmers' Union, whose membership infiltrated the Tennessee Department of Agriculture and the Cooperative Extension Service. Acting through these bureaucracies, Tennessee agrarian leaders exerted an important influence over the development of agricultural legislation for the twentieth century. Up from the Mudsills of Hell not only provides an important reassessment of agrarian reform and radicalism in Tennessee, but also links this Upper South state into the broader sweep of southern and American farm movements emerging in the late nineteenth century.

eISBN: 978-0-8203-3080-8
Subjects: History
You do not have access to this book on JSTOR. Try logging in through your institution for access.
Log in to your personal account or through your institution.
Table of Contents
Export Selected Citations Export to NoodleTools Export to RefWorks Export to EasyBib Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero, Mendeley...) Export a Text file (For BibTex)
Select / Unselect all
  1. Front Matter
    Front Matter (pp. i-vi)
  2. Table of Contents
    Table of Contents (pp. vii-viii)
  3. List of Illustrations
    List of Illustrations (pp. ix-x)
  4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (pp. xi-xiv)
  5. INTRODUCTION
    INTRODUCTION (pp. 1-8)

    During the bitter gubernatorial campaign of 1892, newspaperman and Democratic stalwart Edward W. Carmack held a rally in Obion County, the heart-land of the Agricultural Wheel and the Farmers’ Alliance in Tennessee. In his harangue against the reelection of Alliance governor John P. Buchanan, Carmack referred to the Populists who supported the incumbent: “If you dig down under the mudsill of Hell,” he intoned, “you would find Populists down there!”¹

    Carmack’s impassioned denunciation of Populists demonstrated how seriously Democrats took the threat posed by Populists, as former Democratic political adversaries put aside their divisions and committed themselves to party unity...

  6. CHAPTER ONE SURVEYING THE BARNYARDS: TENNESSEE FARMERS IN THE AGE OF AGRARIAN REFORM
    CHAPTER ONE SURVEYING THE BARNYARDS: TENNESSEE FARMERS IN THE AGE OF AGRARIAN REFORM (pp. 9-48)

    Unlike most farmers of his day, Archelaus M. Hughes kept a diary. The father of young children, he had little help in the fields and generally limited his diary entries to days when bad weather drove him inside. He tended to the morose, with rain seeming to add to his melancholy but bad weather did not fully account for the gloom of his agricultural forecasts and his own prospects for retaining his hold on the land and providing for his family.¹

    Like most farmers of his time, Hughes believed society had an agricultural foundation. Farmers produced the food and fiber...

  7. CHAPTER TWO ORGANIZING FOR THE GRAND WORK
    CHAPTER TWO ORGANIZING FOR THE GRAND WORK (pp. 49-86)

    In the years following the Civil War, agricultural organizations sprang up to address the needs of farmers and their families. Ranging in scope and focus from agricultural societies designed to reinforce the political and social hegemony of planter elites to associations for rural uplift, institutes to advance scientific agriculture, and cooperatives to control commodity prices, these organizations reflected the desires of their members to establish order in the open country, where the impact of modern industrial capitalism undermined established social, political, and economic networks.

    The most important organizations—the Patrons of Husbandry (the Grange), the Agricultural Wheel, and the Farmers’...

  8. CHAPTER THREE BUILDING COOPERATIVISM
    CHAPTER THREE BUILDING COOPERATIVISM (pp. 87-122)

    Gilded Age agrarian reformers built their organization on the existing rural community. The establishment of local Wheels and Alliances drew together friends and kin, farmers with similar experiences and histories, and extant community institutions that included country churches and other quasi-religious organizations such as the Masonic lodges. Tapping into existing community bonds strengthened the Wheel and Alliance even as agrarian leaders introduced a new ideology that undermined traditional politics, social relations, and agricultural practices. Paradoxically, dependence on country ties to kin and family also weakened agrarian reform as localism prevailed, allowing prejudices ranging from racism to sectionalism to dampen more...

  9. CHAPTER FOUR FARM ISSUES IN THE POLITICAL ECONOMY
    CHAPTER FOUR FARM ISSUES IN THE POLITICAL ECONOMY (pp. 123-156)

    Wheel and Alliance ideology always left the door open to political action. As McDowell so often noted, the solution to the agrarian crisis rested in the ballot box, and the problems encountered in establishing the state’s cooperatives made politics more attractive. In addition, farmers needed state law to protect their business arrangements, and they wanted control over rural institutions: local schools, the land-grant university, and the Bureau of Agriculture. As important as state political action was, advancing rural interests nationally took precedence. With the merger of the Wheel and Alliance, the agrarian movement shifted from an emphasis on community action...

  10. CHAPTER FIVE FROM NONPARTISAN POLITICS TO POPULISM
    CHAPTER FIVE FROM NONPARTISAN POLITICS TO POPULISM (pp. 157-207)

    By 1890, the Alliance insurgency represented a political movement that acted within the parameters of a two-party system, an organized culture of reform, and a legal framework of disfranchisement. Within the context of these competing forces, Tennessee farmers moved beyond the rhetoric of antipartyism and attempted to control the Democratic Party in order to elect candidates supportive of agrarian objectives to state and national offices. The decision to engage in more politically aggressive action developed from the successes and failures of the state and national Farmers’ Alliance. Year after year, from Cleburne to Shreveport, St. Louis, and Ocala, farmers met...

  11. CHAPTER SIX UP FROM THE MUDSILLS OF HELL: FARMERS IN THE PROGRESSIVE ERA
    CHAPTER SIX UP FROM THE MUDSILLS OF HELL: FARMERS IN THE PROGRESSIVE ERA (pp. 208-250)

    The political upheavals of the 1890s and the economic depression that overlapped them fractured whatever unity farmers had claimed through the Alliance and Populism. Convinced that mass movements offered no gains, farmers never again attempted to organize a party based on agrarianism, and many remained skeptical of all political action. The success of the Democratic Party in ousting the radical insurgents did not address the fundamental problems that produced the Wheel, Alliance, and People’s Party. Hard times worsened with the 1893–1897 depression, and even substantial planters were at the mercy of the new corporate monopolies that dominated agriculture in...

  12. NOTES
    NOTES (pp. 251-280)
  13. BIBLIOGRAPHY
    BIBLIOGRAPHY (pp. 281-310)
  14. INDEX
    INDEX (pp. 311-321)
University of Georgia Press logo